<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04276nab a2200265 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20240604152407.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240604b2023    bl.ar|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">H60</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Correia, N&#xFA;bia Maria </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chemical and cultural management strategies for glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in central Brazil</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 27 ref.; 5 tables; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">
Abstract &#x2012; The objective of this work was to evaluate different chemical treatments, associating herbicide combinations with the maintenance of forage species in the off-season, for the management of glyphosate-resistant sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) in a soybean crop. The experimental design was a randomized complete block in a 4&#xD7;5 split-plot arrangement, with four replicates. The treatments consisted of: four combinations of the clethodim, glyphosate, haloxyfop-p-methyl, glufosinate ammonium, and s-metolachlor herbicides in the plots; green covers with the Massai, BRS Tamani, and BRS Zuri cultivars of Panicum maximum and with Urochloa ruziziensis, as well as fallow, in the subplots; and a control with the isolated application of glyphosate at the desiccation and post-emergence of the soybean crop infested with sourgrass and weeded. The herbicides tested before sowing and at post-emergence of soybean promoted a control above 90% of adult sourgrass plants until grain harvest. After harvest, there was a new emergence of sourgrass, mainly in the plots without green cover in the off-season. Overseeding soybean with forage species allowed of the establishment of these plants, which consequently interfered in sourgrass emergence and growth. The chemical treatments with herbicide combinations associated with the maintenance of forage species in the off-season are effective for the control of adult glyphosate-resistant sourgrass plants.


Index terms: Digitaria insularis, Panicum maximum, Urochloa ruziziensis, chemical control, overseeding.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">
Resumo &#x2012; O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar diferentes tratamentos qu&#xED;micos, com a associa&#xE7;&#xE3;o de combina&#xE7;&#xF5;es de herbicidas &#xE0; manuten&#xE7;&#xE3;o de esp&#xE9;cies forrageiras no per&#xED;odo de entressafra, para o manejo de capim&#x2011;amargoso (Digitaria insularis) resistente ao glifosato em cultura de soja. O delineamento experimental foi de blocos ao acaso, em arranjo de parcela subdividida 4&#xD7;5, com quatro repeti&#xE7;&#xF5;es. Os tratamentos consistiram de: quatro combina&#xE7;&#xF5;es dos herbicidas cletodim, glifosato, haloxifop-p-metil, glufosinato de am&#xF4;nio e s-metolacloro nas parcelas; de coberturas verdes com as cultivares de Panicum maximum Massai, BRS Tamani e BRS Zuri e com Urochloa ruziziensis, al&#xE9;m de pousio, nas subparcelas; e controle com a aplica&#xE7;&#xE3;o isolada de glifosato na desseca&#xE7;&#xE3;o e na p&#xF3;s-emerg&#xEA;ncia da cultura de soja infestada com capim-amargoso e capinada. Os herbicidas testados antes da semeadura e na p&#xF3;s-emerg&#xEA;ncia da soja promoveram um controle acima de 90% de plantas adultas de capim-amargoso at&#xE9; a colheita dos gr&#xE3;os. Ap&#xF3;s a colheita, houve nova emerg&#xEA;ncia de capim-amargoso, principalmente nas parcelas sem cobertura verde na entressafra. A sobressemeadura da soja com esp&#xE9;cies forrageiras permitiu o estabelecimento dessas plantas, que, consequentemente, interferiram na emerg&#xEA;ncia e no crescimento do capim-amargoso. Os tratamentos qu&#xED;micos com combina&#xE7;&#xF5;es de herbicidas  associados &#xE0; manuten&#xE7;&#xE3;o de esp&#xE9;cies forrageiras no per&#xED;odo da entressafra s&#xE3;o eficazes para o controle de plantas adultas de capim-amargoso resistente ao glifosato.


Termos para indexa&#xE7;&#xE3;o: Digitaria insularis, Panicum maximum, Urochloa ruziziensis, controle qu&#xED;mico, sobressemeadura.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PLANTA FORRAGEIRA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ERVA DANINHA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CAPIM-GORDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CONTROLE QU&#xCD;MICO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">HERBICIDA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">920</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">25804</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Bras&#xED;lia-DF Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria - EMBRAPA 1966-</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2023-436359</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Brasileira (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0100-204X</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 58 p. 1-10; (2023)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2024001097</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/RPHgBH7xbhyyFw496xNS9rP/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Anal&#xED;tica</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">299898</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">299898</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
