<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03677nab a2200349 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20241114110822.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">241114b2021    bl.ar|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F04</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">1623</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F06</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Wenneck, Gustavo Soares </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Saath, Reni </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rezende, Roberto </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Andrean, Andr&#xE9; Felipe Barion Alves </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Santi, Danilo C&#xE9;sar </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Agronomic response of cauliflower to the addition of silicon to the soil under water deficit</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o online; 34 ref.; 5 illus.; 4 tables; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

ABSTRACT - Water deficit in cauliflower cultivation may impair its development and yield. This study aimed to analyze the agronomic performance of cauliflower grown in a protected environment, under different water conditions and silicon (Si) doses. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design, in a 3 x 4 factorial scheme, with three levels of water replacement [40, 70 and 100 % of the evapotranspiration (ETc)] and four Si doses (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha-1), with four replications. Leaf (SPAD index, area, fresh and dry weight), stem (diameter, height, fresh and dry weight) and inflorescence (diameter, fresh weight, dry weight, water content and commercial classification) characteristics were evaluated. The replacement of 40 % of the ETc showed lower results for the SPAD index in the phases II and III, leaf area, leaf and stem fresh weight and inflorescence diameter. The 70 % replacement cultivation showed a yield similar to that of the 100 % of the ETc. The use of Si was beneficial for the productive performance of the cauliflower at all levels of water replacement.


KEYWORDS: Brassica oleracea var. botrytis, water stress, irrigation management.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

RESUMO - Resposta agron&#xF4;mica de couve-flor &#xE0; adi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de sil&#xED;cio ao solo sob estresse h&#xED;drico -  O d&#xE9;ficit h&#xED;drico no cultivo pode prejudicar o desenvolvimento e a produtividade da couve-flor. Objetivou-se analisar o desempenho agron&#xF4;mico de couve-flor cultivada em ambiente protegido, em diferentes condi&#xE7;&#xF5;es h&#xED;dricas e doses de sil&#xED;cio (Si). Utilizou-se delineamento em blocos ao acaso, em esquema fatorial 3 x 4, sendo tr&#xEA;s n&#xED;veis de reposi&#xE7;&#xE3;o h&#xED;drica [40, 70 e 100 % da evapotranspira&#xE7;&#xE3;o (ETc)] e quatro doses de Si (0, 50, 100 e 150 kg ha-1), com quatro repeti&#xE7;&#xF5;es. Foram avaliadas caracter&#xED;sticas das folhas (&#xED;ndice SPAD, &#xE1;rea, massa fresca e seca), do caule (di&#xE2;metro, altura, massa fresca e seca) e da infloresc&#xEA;ncia (di&#xE2;metro, massa fresca, massa seca, teor de &#xE1;gua e classifica&#xE7;&#xE3;o comercial). A reposi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de 40 % da ETc apresentou menores resultados para o &#xED;ndice SPAD nas fases II e III, &#xE1;rea foliar, massa fresca das folhas e do caule e di&#xE2;metro da infloresc&#xEA;ncia. O cultivo com reposi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de 70 % apresentou produtividade semelhante &#xE0; de 100 % da ETc. A utiliza&#xE7;&#xE3;o do Si foi ben&#xE9;fica para o desempenho produtivo da couve-flor em todos os n&#xED;veis de reposi&#xE7;&#xE3;o h&#xED;drica.


PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Brassica oleracea var. botrytis, estresse h&#xED;drico, manejo da irriga&#xE7;&#xE3;o.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COUVE-FLOR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DEFICI&#xCA;NCIA  H&#xCD;DRICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">IRRIGA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MANEJO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SIL&#xCD;CIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PRODUTIVIDADE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">3248</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">317347</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Goi&#xE2;nia-GO UFG. Escola de Agronomia 1999</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2024-3999</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Tropical (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1517-6398</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 51 p. 1-9; (2021)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2024003431</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/pat/a/xtFpn3xZ94CtYvGsd3JqwZC/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">328644</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">328644</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
