<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04761nab a2200313 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20241119130140.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">241119b2021    bl.ar|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">P34</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">0332</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Santos, Allef Barbosa dos </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gondim, Tarc&#xED;sio Marcos de Souza </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fernandes J&#xFA;nior, Paulo Ivan </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lima, Liziane Maria de </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Effect of fungicides on the symbiosis between Bradyrhizobium strains and peanut</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o online; 33 ref.; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

ABSTRACT - Seed treatment with fungicides is an important practice for the control of phytopathogens in peanut crops. However, these products can harm rhizobacteria (Bradyrhizobium) and inhibit processes such as biological nitrogen fixation. This study aimed to verify the effects of the treatment of peanut seeds cv. BR1 inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. with fungicides. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, using two combinations of fungicides [C1: carboxin (200 g L-1) + tiram (200 g L-1); C2: pyraclostrobin (25 g L-1) + thiophanate methyl (225 g L-1) + fipronil (250 g L-1)] and one control without fungicide; two inoculants based on Bradyrhizobium spp. (SEMIA 6144 and ESA 123) and one control with a nitrogen chemical source (ammonium nitrate). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 3 (2 with fungicide and 1 without fungicide) x 4 (2 inoculations based on rhizobia, 1 N mineral source and 1 without N) x 2 (1 or 2 inoculants applications) factorial scheme, with 5 replications. The root and shoot dry mass, plant height, nodulation and leaf nitrogen accumulation were evaluated. The application of both combinations reduced the number of nodules on plant roots, mainly for C1. The vegetative growth and nitrogen in the leaves were affected by C1, whereas, for C2, there were increments higher than for the control without fungicides. ESA 123 was more tolerant to the effects of fungicides on nodulation. Regarding the number of inoculations, there was an increase in the nitrogen rate with two inoculations. C2, despite affecting the nodulation, was less toxic to the inoculants SEMIA 6144 and ESA 123.


KEYWORDS: Arachis hypogaea L., inoculants, biological nitrogen fixation, phytopathogens.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

RESUMO - Efeito de fungicidas na simbiose entre estirpes de Bradyrhizobium e amendoim -  O tratamento de sementes com fungicidas &#xE9; uma pr&#xE1;tica importante para o controle de fitopat&#xF3;genos na cultura do amendoim. Todavia, esses produtos podem prejudicar rizobact&#xE9;rias (Bradyrhizobium) e inibir processos como a fixa&#xE7;&#xE3;o biol&#xF3;gica de nitrog&#xEA;nio. Objetivou-se verificar os efeitos do tratamento de sementes de amendoim cv. BR1 inoculadas com estirpes de Bradyrhizobium spp. com fungicidas. O experimento foi conduzido em casa-de-vegeta&#xE7;&#xE3;o, utilizando-se duas combina&#xE7;&#xF5;es de fungicidas [C1: carboxin (200 g L-1) + tiram (200 g L-1); C2: pyraclostrobin (25 g L-1) + thiophanate methyl (225 g L-1) + fipronil (250 g L-1)] e uma testemunha sem fungicida; dois inoculantes &#xE0; base de Bradyrhizobium spp. (SEMIA 6144 e ESA 123) e uma testemunha com fonte qu&#xED;mica nitrogenada (nitrato de am&#xF4;nio). O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado, em esquema fatorial 3 (2 com fungicida e 1 sem fungicida) x 4 (2 inocula&#xE7;&#xF5;es &#xE0; base de riz&#xF3;bios, 1 fonte mineral de N e 1 sem N) x 2 (1 ou 2 aplica&#xE7;&#xF5;es de inoculantes), com 5 repeti&#xE7;&#xF5;es. Foram avaliados a massa seca da raiz e da parte a&#xE9;rea, altura de plantas, nodula&#xE7;&#xE3;o e ac&#xFA;mulo de nitrog&#xEA;nio nas folhas. A aplica&#xE7;&#xE3;o de ambas as combina&#xE7;&#xF5;es reduziu o n&#xFA;mero de n&#xF3;dulos nas ra&#xED;zes das plantas, principalmente para C1. O crescimento vegetativo e o nitrog&#xEA;nio nas folhas foram afetados por C1, enquanto, para C2, houve incrementos superiores aos da testemunha sem fungicidas. ESA 123 foi mais tolerante aos efeitos dos fungicidas na nodula&#xE7;&#xE3;o. Em rela&#xE7;&#xE3;o ao n&#xFA;mero de inocula&#xE7;&#xF5;es, observou-se incremento na taxa de N com duas inocula&#xE7;&#xF5;es. C2, apesar de afetar a nodula&#xE7;&#xE3;o, foi menos t&#xF3;xica aos inoculantes SEMIA 6144 e ESA 123.


PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Arachis hypogaea L., inoculantes, fixa&#xE7;&#xE3;o biol&#xF3;gica de nitrog&#xEA;nio, fitopat&#xF3;genos.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AMENDOIM</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TRATAMENTO DE SEMENTE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INOCULA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FIXA&#xC7;&#xC3;O DE NITROG&#xCA;NIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FITOPAT&#xD3;GENO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">3248</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">317347</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Goi&#xE2;nia-GO UFG. Escola de Agronomia 1999</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2024-3999</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Tropical (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1517-6398</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 51 p. 1-7; (2021)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2024003470</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/pat/a/qBbSBpGzhJKTqRhDsjnsMfc/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">328712</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">328712</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
