<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04076nab a2200289 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250324165425.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250324b2016    bl.qr|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F63</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Souza, Camila Silveira de </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Aoki, Camila </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ribas, Augusto </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pott, Arnildo</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sigrist, Maria Ros&#xE2;ngela </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Floral traits as potential indicators of pollination vs. theft</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 48 ref.; 3 tables; 2 illus.; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Abstract

Floral visitation does not necessarily mean pollination, as several animals utilize floral resources without transferring
pollen. Since pollinators and thieves can affect the reproduction, morphology and diversification of flowering plants,
we here investigated if attributes of flowers and flowering of plant species collected in the central Brazilian vereda
would predict the pollination (pollen seeking) or theft (pollen/nectar theft) during the visits. It was hypothesized
that non specialized flowers would have a higher incidence of thievery, where as specialization, for example,
the presence of large and medium flowers with long corolla, making it difficult to access nectar, would lead to
increased pollination. As a result, four attributes were mainly associated with illegitimate visits, and in order of
importance, they are size (small), quantity of flowers per plant (large), flowering time (&lt; 10 months) and floral
type (inconspicuous). The richest and most abundant visitor groups, including bees, flies and wasps, acted mainly
as potential pollinators, while cockroaches, butterflies, beetles, ants and hemipterans acted as thieves. However,
further studies are required to confirm that this pattern is repeated in other larger and more diverse communities,
thus confirming the possible preference for floral thieves.

Key words:vereda, bees, anthophilous fauna, flowering, generalist flower.




Resumo

Tipos florais de plantas como potenciais indicadores da ocorr&#xEA;ncia de poliniza&#xE7;&#xE3;o vs. pilhagem. A visita&#xE7;&#xE3;o floral
n&#xE3;o &#xE9; sin&#xF4;nimo de poliniza&#xE7;&#xE3;o, v&#xE1;rios animais utilizam recursos florais sem transferir p&#xF3;len. Essas visitas podem
ser consideradas pilhagem. Polinizadores e pilhadores podem afetar a diversifica&#xE7;&#xE3;o morfol&#xF3;gica, taxon&#xF4;mica e
reprodutiva das esp&#xE9;cies de plantas, e n&#xF3;s investigamos se os atributos florais e de flora&#xE7;&#xE3;o das esp&#xE9;cies de plantas
amostradas em vegeta&#xE7;&#xE3;o de vereda nos dariam evid&#xEA;ncia de visitas de poliniza&#xE7;&#xE3;o (transporte de p&#xF3;len) ou de
pilhagem (roubo de n&#xE9;ctar/p&#xF3;len). Esperamos que as flores n&#xE3;o especializadas tenham uma maior incid&#xEA;ncia
de pilhagem, enquanto flores especializadas, por exemplo com tamanho grande e m&#xE9;dio e corolas longas,
com n&#xE9;ctar menos acess&#xED;vel, tenderiam a ser polinizadas e menos pilhadas. Quatro atributos foram associados
principalmente com visitas ileg&#xED;timas, tamanho da flor (pequeno), quantidade de flores por planta (muitas flores),
tempo de flora&#xE7;&#xE3;o (&lt;10 meses) e tipo floral (inconsp&#xED;cuo). Os grupos mais ricos e mais abundantes de visitantes,
incluindo abelhas, moscas e vespas, atuaram principalmente como potenciais polinizadores, enquanto baratas,
borboletas, besouros, formigas e hem&#xED;pteros atuaram como pilhadores. No entanto, mais estudos s&#xE3;o necess&#xE1;rios
para confirmar se esse padr&#xE3;o se repete em outras comunidades maiores e mais diversificadas, confirmando assim
a eventual prefer&#xEA;ncia dos pilhadores.

Palavras-chave: vereda, abelhas, fauna ant&#xF3;fila, flora&#xE7;&#xE3;o, flor generalista.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ABELHA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FAUNA </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FLORA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FLOR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">709</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">349362</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Rio de Janeiro-RJ Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro 1935</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2025-1881</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Rodrigu&#xE9;sia (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0370-6583; 2175-7860 on-line</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 67(2) p. 309-320; (2016)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2025000299</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/rod/a/b3Brn8xnnFrnxTKDZ5BZxfS/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">330626</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">330626</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
