<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>05496nab a2200337 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20250527122814.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250527b2024    bl.ar|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vidal-Lezama, Elo&#xED;sa </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Villegas-Monter, &#xC1;ngel </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vaquera-Huerta, Humberto </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Robledo-Paz, Alejandrina,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mart&#xED;nez-Palacios, Alejandro </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gisela, Ferreira, </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Imbibition and germination of fresh chincuya (Annona purpurea Moc &amp; Sess&#xE9; Dunal) seeds, by effect of gibberelic acid and pH of the soaking water</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">
Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o online; 35 ref.; 5 tables; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


Abstract:    Germination is influenced by several factors, among them pH. Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of imbibition-water pH on the water absorption curve of chincuya seeds and germination. The results were contrasted to the known effect of gibberellic acid imbibition. In the first year of fruit collection and evaluation, imbibition curves were constructed per treatment. The seeds of this evaluation were divided into two lots: the first at the initial moisture content (39.9 %) and the second at the moisture content of 34.1 % after three days of drying in the laboratory. The seeds were imbibed for 84 h in distilled water at three pH levels (5, 7, and 9) and kept in a water bath at 30 &#xB0;C. In the second year of collection and evaluation, the pH treatments were repeated, and an imbibition treatment with gibberellic acid at 350 mg L-1 (pH 3.9) was added. A control treatment contained distilled water at pH 6.1. For both years, treated seeds were incubated on paper towels and placed under controlled conditions at a 12-hour photoperiod and alternating day and night temperatures (30 &#xB0;C:25 &#xB0;C). The three imbibition curves showed similar behavior and no statistical significance. Seeds with a higher moisture content did not gain weight after imbibition. The imbibition curves increased constantly in the seeds at 34.1 % moisture, and weight gain reached almost 46 % with the pH 9 treatment. However, there were no statistical differences among treatments. The highest rate of water absorption occurred in the first six hours in the open-air, dehydrated seeds, and after 72 hours, the weight of the seeds did not increase. Average daily germination kinetics indicated a slow and poor germination process. Gibberellic acid significantly promoted germination, causing 43 % germination. The absolute control reached 5.7 %, while the rest of the treatments did not promote germination.


Keywords:    water absorption curve, Phase I, physiological dormancy, moisture content</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


Resumo:    A germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o &#xE9; influenciada por diversos fatores, entre eles o pH. Para conhecer o efeito do pH da &#xE1;gua de embebi&#xE7;&#xE3;o na curva de aquisi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de &#xE1;gua das sementes de chincuya, assim como na germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o e compar&#xE1;-lo com o efeito conhecido da embebi&#xE7;&#xE3;o em &#xE1;cido giber&#xE9;lico, foram realizados dois experimentos. Em um primeiro ano de coleta de frutos, constru&#xED;ram-se as curvas de embebi&#xE7;&#xE3;o com os tratamentos. As sementes desta avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o foram divididas em dois lotes: o primeiro com o conte&#xFA;do de umidade inicial (39.9%), e o segundo com sementes secas por tr&#xEA;s dias em laborat&#xF3;rio (34.1% de umidade). As sementes foram embebidas por 84 horas em &#xE1;gua destilada com tr&#xEA;s diferentes n&#xED;veis de pH (5, 7 e 9) e foram mantidas em banho-maria a 30&#xB0;C. No segundo ano de coleta foram repetidos os tratamentos de pH e acrescentado o tratamento de embebi&#xE7;&#xE3;o com &#xE1;cido giber&#xE9;lico a 350mg L-1 (com pH 3.9) e a testemunha com &#xE1;gua destilada (pH 6.1). Nos dois anos de avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o, as sementes receberam os tratamentos, foram incubadas em toalhas de papel e mantidas em condi&#xE7;&#xF5;es controladas de temperaturas alternadas de 30&#xB0;C dia e 25&#xB0;C noite, com 12h de fotoper&#xED;odo. Observou-se que as tr&#xEA;s curvas de aquisi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de &#xE1;gua mostraram comportamento semelhante e sem signific&#xE2;ncia estat&#xED;stica; as sementes n&#xE3;o aumentaram de peso depois da imers&#xE3;o, pois o conte&#xFA;do inicial de umidade era elevado. Nas sementes com 34.1% de umidade, as curvas de aquisi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de &#xE1;gua tiveram aumento constante e o peso das sementes aumentou at&#xE9; cerca de 46% com o pH 9. N&#xE3;o houve diferen&#xE7;a estat&#xED;stica entre os tratamentos. A maior velocidade de aquisi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de &#xE1;gua ocorreu nas primeras seis horas nas sementes secas ao ambiente e depois de 72 horas o peso das sementes n&#xE3;o aumentou. A cin&#xE9;tica da germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o m&#xE9;dia di&#xE1;ria apresentou um lento e escasso processo germinativo. O &#xE1;cido giber&#xE9;lico aumentou significativamente a germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o, promovendo 43% de germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o, enquanto com a testemunha absoluta se alcan&#xE7;ou 5.7%. Com os demais tratamentos n&#xE3;o se observou germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o.


Termos de indexa&#xE7;&#xE3;o: curva de aquisi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de &#xE1;gua; Fase I da germina&#xE7;&#xE3;o; dorm&#xEA;ncia fisiol&#xF3;gica; conte&#xFA;do de umidade.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FRUTA TROPICAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SEMENTE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">EMBEBI&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GERMINA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&#xC1;CIDO GIBER&#xC9;LICO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UMIDADE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">805</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">350483</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Jaboticabal-SP Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura 1978</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2025-3102</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0100-2945</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 46 p. 1-13; (2024)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2025003002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/rbf/a/mY4Lcstpm53fHTXQqTYytmr/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">331741</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">331741</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
