<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04991nab a2200325 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251012123102.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">251012b2017    bl.|r|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">J11</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">0710</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gon&#xE7;alves, Marcos Westphal </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Argenta, Luiz Carlos </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Martin, Mariuccia Schlichting  de </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Maturity and quality of apple fruit durinig the harvest period  at apple industry</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">
Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o online; 18 ref.; 4 illus; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


ABSTRACT &#x2013;     A database of maturity and quality indices was built by analysis of 62,807 samples of 100 &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; apples and 29,053 samples of 100 &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; apples at harvest, over 11 years (2005-2015) in an apple industry warehouse. Apple fruit were harvested in Fraiburgo (SC), S&#xE3;o Joaquim (SC) and Vacaria (RS). Data on firmness, starch index (SI), soluble solid content (SS), titratable acidity (TA), size and grades (external appearance) of apple fruit were submitted to linear and nonlinear regression analyses. Each fruit was graded by analysis of external qualities (color and surface blemishes) following Brazilian legal standards. At apples industry, the harvest period extended from 3rd to 15th week of the year for &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; and from 10th to 22nd week of the year for &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; apples, although approximately 70% of total production for &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; and &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; apples was harvested in a period of 4 and 6 weeks, respectively. Average maturity of 11 years varied from the 1st to the last week of harvest as follows: &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; apples: 17.9 to 14.2 pounds (firmness), 4.0 to 6.1 (SI), 12.2 to 13.1% (SS) and 5.7 to 3.9 meq 100 mL-1 (TA). &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; apples: 17.1 to 14.3 pounds (firmness), 3.9 to 6.4 (SI), 12.9 to 14.4% (SS), 6.2 to 3.8 meq 100 mL-1 (TA). Approximately 48% of &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; samples and 45% of &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; samples had firmness higher than 17 and 16 pounds, respectively, intended for long term storage, while 6% of &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; samples and 8.5% of &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; samples had firmness lower than 14 pounds, intended for marketing shortly after harvest. The frequency of apple samples graded as Extra, Cat1, Cat2, Cat3 and out of category were 6%, 32%, 34% and 6% for &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; apples and 5%, 39%, 33%, 18%, 5% for &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; apples.



Index terms:     Malus domestica, harvest date, category, pulp firmness</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


RESUMO &#x2013;    O objetivo deste trabalho foi formar um banco de dados de &#xED;ndices de matura&#xE7;&#xE3;o e qualidade pela an&#xE1;lise de 62807 amostras de 100 ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; e 29053 amostras de 100 ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019;, na colheita, constitu&#xED;do ao longo de 11 anos (2005 a 2015), em uma empresa comercial. As ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s foram colhidas em Fraiburgo (SC), S&#xE3;o Joaquim (SC) e Vacaria (RS). Os dados de firmeza de polpa, &#xED;ndice de amido (IA), teor de s&#xF3;lidos sol&#xFA;veis (SS), acidez titul&#xE1;vel (AT), tamanho e categoria das ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s foram submetidos a an&#xE1;lises de regress&#xF5;es lineares e n&#xE3;o lineares. A categoria de cada fruto foi determinada pela an&#xE1;lise da qualidade externa (colora&#xE7;&#xE3;o e danos) segundo normas legais Brasileiras. O per&#xED;odo de colheita comercial se estendeu da 3&#xAA; &#xE0; 15&#xAA; semana do ano para a &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; e da 10&#xAA; a 22&#xAA; semana do ano para a &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019;, embora aproximadamente 70% da produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; e &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; foram colhidas num per&#xED;odo de 4 e 6 semanas, respectivamente. Os &#xED;ndices de matura&#xE7;&#xE3;o dos 11 anos variaram da primeira &#xE0; &#xFA;ltima semana de colheita, sendo que, para ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s &#x2018;Gala&#x2019;, foram de 17,9 a 14,2 lb (Firmeza), 4,0 a 6,1 (IA), 12,2 a 13,1% (SS) e 5,7 a 3,9 meq 100 mL-1 (AT), enquanto que para ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019;foram de 17,1 a 14,3 lb (Firmeza), 3,9 a 6,4 (IA), 12,9 a 14,4% (SS) e 6,2 a 3,8 meq 100 mL-1 (AT). Aproximadamente 48% das amostras de &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; e 45% das amostras de Fuji apresentaram firmeza da polpa superior a 17 lb e 16 lb, respectivamente, adequadas para longos per&#xED;odos de armazenagem, enquanto 6% das amostras de &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; e 8,5% das amostras de &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019; apresentaram firmeza da polpa inferior a 14 lb, indicadas &#xE0; comercializa&#xE7;&#xE3;o imediata ap&#xF3;s a colheita. As frequ&#xEA;ncias de amostras de ma&#xE7;&#xE3;s com qualidade Extra, Cat1, Cat2, Cat3 e fora de Categoria foram de 6%, 32%, 34%, 22% e 6%, respectivamente, para &#x2018;Gala&#x2019; e 5%, 39%, 33%, 18%, 5% para &#x2018;Fuji&#x2019;.



Termos para indexa&#xE7;&#xE3;o:     Malus domestica, ponto de colheita, categoria, firmeza de polpa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MA&#xC7;&#xC3;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&#xC9;POCA DE COLHEITA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MATURA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARMAZENAMENTO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">QUALIDADE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FIRMEZA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">POLPA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">805</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">317030</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Jaboticabal-SP Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura 1978</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2024-3592</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0100-2945</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 39(5) p. 1-10; (2017)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2025004234</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/rbf/a/G6Qb7q4NfjCctjMghHJ8kXy/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">338657</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">338657</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
