<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03793nab a2200325 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20251217184231.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">251217b2021    bl.|r|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F04</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">0940</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ciotta, Marlise Nara </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ceretta, Carlos Alberto </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Krug, Amanda Veridiana </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Brunetto, Gustavo </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nava, Gilberto </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) production and soil potassium forms in vineyard subjected to potassium fertilization</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">
Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o online; 37 ref.; 4 tables; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


Abstract &#x2013;      Potassium fertilization can change K forms available in the soil, as well as influence plant absorption of it and yield but, mainly, it can affect grape composition. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of potassium (K) fertilization on grape production and juice (must) composition of a Cabernet Sauvignon cultivar. Grapevines were treated with 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1 year-1 K2O. Leaf K contents, grape yield per plant and area, total soluble solids (TSS), must pH and titratable acidity, and K available in the soil were assessed. Soil samples collected at the 20-cm layer were analyzed to measure K availability and nonexchangeable K in them, based on studies conducted over 3 growing seasons. Results have shown that K application did not have effect on grape production and must composition, although it increased K contents in leaf blade and petiole. However, annual K fractionation in the soil has suggested that 100 kg ha-1 year-1 K2O is the K dose capable of maintaining K availability to plants at more appropriate contents throughout the growing seasons.



Index terms:       Vitis vinifera, K fertilizer rates; yield components; K in berry; chemical fractionation of K.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


Resumo -      A aduba&#xE7;&#xE3;o pot&#xE1;ssica pode modificar as formas de K no solo, influenciando a absor&#xE7;&#xE3;o pela planta e a produtividade, mas principalmente a composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o da uva. O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar o impacto da fertiliza&#xE7;&#xE3;o com pot&#xE1;ssio (K) na uva, a produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o e a composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o do mosto de uva da cultivar &#x2018;Cabernet Sauvignon&#x2019;. As videiras foram tratadas com 0; 50; 100; 150 e 200 kg ha-1 ano-1 de K2O. Foram avaliados os teores de K na folha, a produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de uva por planta e por &#xE1;rea, os s&#xF3;lidos sol&#xFA;veis totais (SST), o pH do mosto e a acidez titul&#xE1;vel no mosto, e o K dispon&#xED;vel no solo. Amostras de solo coletadas na camada superficial de 20 cm foram analisadas para medir a disponibilidade de K e o K n&#xE3;o troc&#xE1;vel, com base em estudos conduzidos ao longo de 3 safras. Os resultados mostraram, pela an&#xE1;lise das tr&#xEA;s safras da videira, que a aplica&#xE7;&#xE3;o de K n&#xE3;o afetou a produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o e a composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o do mosto, embora tenha aumentado o teor de K na folha. No entanto, o fracionamento anual de K do solo sugere que 100 kg ha-1 ano-1 de K2O &#xE9; a dose de K capaz de manter a disponibilidade do nutriente para as plantas em teores mais adequados ao longo das esta&#xE7;&#xF5;es de cultivo.



Termos para indexa&#xE7;&#xE3;o:       Vitis vinifera, doses de aduba&#xE7;&#xE3;o pot&#xE1;ssica, componentes do rendimento, pot&#xE1;ssio na baga, fracionamento qu&#xED;mico do pot&#xE1;ssio</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">UVA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ADUBA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">POT&#xC1;SSIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AN&#xC1;LISE DO SOLO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PROPRIEDADE F&#xCD;SICO-QU&#xCD;MICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">RENDIMENTO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">805</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">317050</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Jaboticabal-SP Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura 1978</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2024-3612</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0100-2945</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 43(1) p. 1-11; (2021)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2025004757</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/rbf/a/Hg9BPjndxcM9x9HcnzMGThr/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">339482</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">339482</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
