<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02096nab a2200289 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260416155754.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260416b2019    bl.qr|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">K10</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">3140</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nicoletti, Marcos Felipe </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Carvalho, Samuel de P&#xE1;dua Chaves e </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Machado, Sebasti&#xE3;o do Amaral </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Figueiredo Filho, Afonso </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Oliveira, Gustavo Silva </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 26 ref.; 7 tables; 2 illus.; Summary (En)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to assess the prediction of partial volumes with nonlinear mixed
modeling for Pinus taeda. The volume of 558 trees was measured. The four-parameter logistic
model was used in its modified form for the nonlinear mixed approach and, for comparison, the
5th degree polynomial was used. In the mixed modeling, the random effects diameter, age and
place were inserted. The statistical criteria used to assess the quality of the adjustment were the
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), standard error
of the estimate (Syx) and residual graphical analysis. Among the random effects analyzed, age
obtained the best adjustment. However, to predict partial volumes, it was noticed that, regardless
of the analyzed portion of the trunk, the 5th degree polynomial had the best estimates, with a
mean standard error of 20.1% of the estimate compared to 51.8% of the logistic.

Keywords: forest biometrics, logistic model, taper.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PINUS TAEDA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BIOMETRIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FLORESTA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AN&#xC1;LISE ESTAT&#xCD;STICA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">2929</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">347953</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Rio de Janeiro-RJ Instituto de Florestas - UFRRJ 1994</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2025-0452</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Floresta e Ambiente (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1415-0980  /  ISSN 2179-8087 0nline</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 26(4) p. 1-10; (2019)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2026001193</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/floram/a/CkHrFYG4RgK5kJygRkGDttF/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">341413</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">341413</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
