<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03644nab a2200349 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260427173434.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260427b2019    bl.mr|pooa||| 00| 0 por |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">por</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">E16</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">8310</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">E14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Monteiro, Jonathas Viana </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nor&#xF5;es,  Alana Kedylla Monteiro </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ara&#xFA;jo, Rog&#xE9;rio C&#xE9;sar Pereira de </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ara&#xFA;jo, Jair Andrade </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Silva, Felipe Pinto da </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Metafronteira de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o e efici&#xEA;ncia t&#xE9;cnica da carcinicultura nos estados do Cear&#xE1; e Rio Grande do Norte</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 27 ref.; 6 tables; Sumaries (Pt, En)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Resumo: No Nordeste do Brasil, a carcinicultura tem alcan&#xE7;ado n&#xED;vel elevado de efici&#xEA;ncia t&#xE9;cnica, por&#xE9;m, estes avan&#xE7;os n&#xE3;o v&#xEA;m acontecendo de forma homog&#xEA;nea entre os estados produtores. Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar as diferen&#xE7;as tecnol&#xF3;gicas da produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de camar&#xE3;o cultivado existentes entre os dois maiores produtores nacionais deste produto, Cear&#xE1; e Rio Grande do Norte, em 2011. Para isto, aplicou-se o modelo de metafronteira tecnol&#xF3;gica proposto por Battese, Rao e O&#x2019;Donnell, que objetiva estimar uma fun&#xE7;&#xE3;o envolt&#xF3;ria das fronteiras estoc&#xE1;sticas de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o dos dois estados. Os dados relativos &#xE0; produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o e ao gerenciamento das fazendas de camar&#xE3;o foram extra&#xED;dos do Censo da Carcinicultura de 2011, realizado pela Associa&#xE7;&#xE3;o Brasileira de Criadores de Camar&#xE3;o (ABCC), sendo 100 fazendas localizadas no Cear&#xE1; e 112, no Rio Grande do Norte. Os resultados mostraram que, em termos m&#xE9;dios, o Cear&#xE1; apresentou maior efici&#xEA;ncia t&#xE9;cnica (ET) do que o Rio Grande do Norte, sendo que a &#xE1;rea m&#xE9;dia dos viveiros teve maior impacto sobre a ET do Cear&#xE1;, e o n&#xFA;mero de funcion&#xE1;rios contratados, sobre a ET do Rio Grande do Norte. 

Palavras-chaves: camar&#xE3;o, efici&#xEA;ncia produtiva, agroneg&#xF3;cio. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Abstract: In the Northeast of Brazil, the shrimp farming has achieved high level of technical efficiency; however, these advances have not happened homogenously among producing states. This study aims to analyze the technological differences of shrimp production occurring among the two major producer states of this commodity, Cear&#xE1; and Rio Grande do Norte, 2011. In order to perform this, we applied the technological meta-frontier model proposed by Battese, Rao and O&#x2019;Donnell, which aims to estimate an envelope function of the production stochastic frontier of the two states. Production and management data were extracted from the 2011 Shrimp Farming Census, conducted by the Brazilian Association of Shrimp Farming (ABCC), constituted of 100 farms in Cear&#xE1; and 112 in Rio Grande do Norte. The results showed that, in average terms, Cear&#xE1; was more technically efficient (ET) than Rio Grande do Norte, and the average area of ponds had higher impact over Cear&#xE1;&#x2019;s ET, while the number of hired workers had higher impact over Rio Grande do Norte&#x2019;s ET. 

Key-words: shrimp, productive efficiency, agribusiness.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AGRONEG&#xD3;CIO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CAMAR&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TECNOLOGIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INOVA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ECONOMIA DA PRODU&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CARCINICULTURA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NORDESTE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">3564</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">316866</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Bras&#xED;lia-DF Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural 1988</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2024-3410</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0103-2003</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 57 (4) p. 530-544; (2019)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2025004921</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/resr/a/yD7pGTkvL9jwfBVVK8hqsqr/?format=pdf&amp;lang=pt</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">341589</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">341589</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
