<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02217nab a2200301 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260511105531.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260511b2020    bl.qr|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F04</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">3530</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">F02</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dias, Gard&#xEA;nia Proto</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Carlos, Leandro </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Alves, Jos&#xE9; Milton </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Silva, La&#xED;sa Cristine Santos </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cavalcante, Thomas Jefferson </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tube Volumes and Fertilization Management in Acrocarpus fraxinifolius Seedlings</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publia&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 27 ref.; 1 table; 5 illus.; Summary (En)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Abstract

Acrocarpus fraxinifolius, known as Indian cedar, has little forestry development in Brazil. Thus, the objective of this
study was to find the best relation between nutrition and container (tube) volume in seedlings of this species. The
experiment was carried out in a 2 &#xD7; 8 factorial scheme (2 containers and 8 fertilizers), with polypropylene tubes of
50 and 110 cm&#xB3; being tested, and the following fertilization treatments: one control, 4 increasing doses of osmocotee
plus: 3, 5, 7, 9 kg per m&#xB3; of substrate, and fractionated mineral fertilizations with cover manure. It was possible to
note that the tube with the highest volume (110 cm&#xB3;) presented better results for the morphological characteristics.
However, when analyzing the physiological variables, it is clear that the 50 cm&#xB3; tubes presented similar results to
the largest volume tube when well fertilized. It is concluded that the indicated to form seedlings of the species is the
combination of tubes of 50 cm&#xB3; with the fertilization or double of this recommendation.

Keywords: Indian cedar, fractional fertilization, osmocotee.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CEDRO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">FERTILIDADE DO SOLO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">NUTRI&#xC7;&#xC3;O VEGETAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MUDA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">2929</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">347956</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Rio de Janeiro-RJ Instituto de Florestas - UFRRJ 1994</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2025-0455</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Floresta e Ambiente (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1415-0980  /  ISSN 2179-8087 0nline</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 27(1) p. 1-7; (2020)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2026001191</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/floram/a/hcdc3gQmxKzMNtvzZGMdPKd/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">341735</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">341735</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
