<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03848nab a2200301 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260514161938.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260514b2020    bl.mr|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">E70</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">E14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Oliveira, Paulo Ricardo Silva </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Silveira, Jos&#xE9; Maria Ferreira Jardim da </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Magalh&#xE3;es, Marcelo Marques de </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Souza, Roney Fraga </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">International trade in GMOs: have markets paid premiums on Brazilian soybeans?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 25 ref.; 6 tables; Sumaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Abstract: The introduction of GMO technology into global market chains and the rejection by consumers in some markets have led to the reorganization of soybean trades. Brazil has adopted the technology later than other countries and specialized in supplying non-GMO soybean between 1996 and 2005. On the other hand, the United States and Argentina, which adopted the technology in 1996, exported to countries with less social aversion to the GM-technology. The aim of this paper is to investigate the relation between changes in global market chains (price, source and destination and market shares) and GMO technology adoption, focusing on evidences for price premiums for non-GM soybeans produced in Brazil, by the analysis of the trade unit values (TUV). In order to do so, we employ multivariate methods (Principal Components and Hierarchical Cluster analyses) and estimate a Random Effect model based on a bilateral trade dataset covering the years from 1986 to 2010. Results show that GM-technology adoption significantly changed trade patterns. However, premiums were paid for Brazilian soybean only in niche markets, where the market share is lower. 

Keywords: GM-food trade, market rejection, premium pricing, technology innovation and trade. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Resumo: A inser&#xE7;&#xE3;o dos Organismos Geneticamente Modificados (OGM) nas redes globais de com&#xE9;rcio, em 1996, e a rejei&#xE7;&#xE3;o de demanda em alguns mercados importantes levaram &#xE0; significativa reorganiza&#xE7;&#xE3;o do com&#xE9;rcio mundial de soja. O Brasil adotou a tecnologia relativamente mais tarde, de forma que se especializou na oferta de soja convencional entre 1996 e 2005. Por outro lado, os Estados Unidos e a Argentina adotaram a tecnologia em 1996, e passaram a exportar, sobretudo, para destinos com menor avers&#xE3;o &#xE0; tecnologia. O objetivo deste artigo &#xE9; explorar as rela&#xE7;&#xF5;es entre a ado&#xE7;&#xE3;o da tecnologia das sementes geneticamente modificadas e as mudan&#xE7;as nos mercados globais (pre&#xE7;os, origens e destinos e parcelas de mercado), buscando, sobretudo, verificar a exist&#xEA;ncia de pre&#xE7;os diferenciados para a soja brasileira, a partir da an&#xE1;lise dos valores unit&#xE1;rios de com&#xE9;rcio. Para tanto, foram utilizados m&#xE9;todos de an&#xE1;lise multivariada (an&#xE1;lise de componente principal e de agrupamento) e estimou-se um modelo de efeitos aleat&#xF3;rios a partir de uma base de dados de com&#xE9;rcio de 1986 a 2010. Os resultados refor&#xE7;am que a tecnologia altera o padr&#xE3;o de com&#xE9;rcio, mas diferenciais de pre&#xE7;o para a soja brasileira s&#xE3;o verificados apenas em mercados de nicho, em que a parcela de mercado do Brasil &#xE9; relativamente menor. 

Palavras-chave: com&#xE9;rcio de transg&#xEA;nicos, rejei&#xE7;&#xE3;o de mercado, diferencial de pre&#xE7;os, inova&#xE7;&#xE3;o tecnol&#xF3;gica e com&#xE9;rcio.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ALIMENTO TRANG&#xCA;NICO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">TECNOLOGIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">INOVA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COMERCIALIZA&#xC7;&#xC3;O</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">3564</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">316870</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Bras&#xED;lia-DF Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural 1988</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2024-3418</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0103-2003</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 58 (1) p. 1-23; (2020)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2025004937</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/resr/a/JJkw6DFQbDC4hQ88tXwZKNF/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">341790</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">341790</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
