<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03882nab a2200337 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260612150023.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260612b2023    bl.qr|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">H60</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Brunetto, Leonardo </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Galon, Leandro </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cavaletti, Daniel Cristian </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Munareto, Janete Denardi </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Castamann, Alfredo </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Perin, Gismael Francisco </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Competitive response and level of economic damage of quinoa in the presence of alexandergrass</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o online; 30 ref.; 3 illus.; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


ABSTRACT: The study of interference and the economic damage level (EDL) of weeds in crops allows more rational management measures to be adopted. Given this, it was the aim of this study to determine the competitive ability and EDL of quinoa genotypes in  the  presence  of  alexandergrass.  Treatments  consisted  of  three  quinoa  genotypes  (Q  1303,  Q  1331,  and  Q  1324),  which  competed with 12 alexandergrass densities: 0, 16, 36, 40, 44, 52, 60, 84, 280, 532, and 1,036; 0, 8, 28, 32, 48, 52, 60, 72, 84, 820, and 988; and, 0, 8, 36, 44, 48, 60, 68, 80, 84, 120, 756, and 848 plants m-2, respectively. Alexandergrass plants were evaluated for plant density (PD), ground cover (GC), leaf area (LA), and aerial dry mass (ADM). In quinoa, grain yield, control cost, selling price, and control efficiency were determined. The quinoa genotype Q 1331 shows greater competitive ability when compared to Q 1303 and Q 1324. EDL values varied from 1.81 to 11.74 plants m-2 for genotype Q 1331, which was more competitive in the presence of alexandergrass. The lowest EDL values ranged from 1.21 to 8.12 plants m-2, for the genotypes Q 1303 and Q 1324, which have the lowest competitiveness with the competitor..  



Key words:      Chenopodium quinoa; plant interference; Urochloa plantaginea</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">


RESUMO:   O  estudo  da  interfer&#xEA;ncia  e  do  n&#xED;vel  de  dano  econ&#xF4;mico  (NDE)  de  plantas  daninhas  em  culturas  permite  adotar  medidas de manejo mais racional. Diante disso, objetivou-se com este estudo determinar a habilidade competitiva e o NDE de gen&#xF3;tipos de quinoa na presen&#xE7;a de papu&#xE3;. Os tratamentos foram compostos por tr&#xEA;s gen&#xF3;tipos de quinoa (Q 1303, Q 1331 e Q 1324), os quais competiram com 12 densidades de papu&#xE3;: 0, 16, 36, 40, 40, 44, 52, 60, 84, 280, 532 e 1036; 0, 8, 28, 32, 32, 48, 52, 60, 72, 84, 820 e 988; e 0, 8, 36, 44, 48, 60, 68, 80, 84, 120, 756 e 848 plantas m-2, respectivamente. Nas plantas de papu&#xE3; foram avaliadas a densidade de plantas (DP), cobertura do solo (CS), &#xE1;rea foliar (AF) e massa seca da parte a&#xE9;rea (MS). Na quinoa determinou-se a produtividade de gr&#xE3;os, custo de controle, pre&#xE7;o de venda e efici&#xEA;ncia de controle. O gen&#xF3;tipo de quinoa Q 1331 apresenta maior habilidade competitiva ao ser comparado com o Q 1303 e Q 1324. Os valores de NDE variam de 1,81 a 11,74 plantas m-2 para o gen&#xF3;tipo Q 1331, sendo esse mais competitivo na presen&#xE7;a do papu&#xE3;. Os menores valores de NDE variam de 1,21 a 8,12 plantas m-2, para os gen&#xF3;tipos Q 1303 e Q 1324, os quais apresentam as menores competitividades com o competidor.  



Palavras-chave:      Chenopodium quinoa; interfer&#xEA;ncia de plantas; Urochloa plantaginea</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">QUINOA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GEN&#xD3;TIPO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">COBERTURA DO SOLO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&#xC1;REA FOLIAR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ERVA DANINHA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DANO ECON&#xD4;MICO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">4656</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">368366</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Recife-PE Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco 2006</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2026-2526</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Revista Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncias Agr&#xE1;rias (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1981-1160</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 18(1) p. 1-10; (2023)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2026001565</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://www.agraria.pro.br/ojs32/index.php/RBCA/article/view/v18i1a2543/1503</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">ANA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">348131</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">348131</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
