<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>03300nab a2200289 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20230831085301.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230502b2018    bl.ar|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">H60</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Duus, J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kruse, N.D.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Streibig, J.C.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Effect of mesotrione and nicosulfuron mixtures with or without adjuvants</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 29 ref.; 7 illus.; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

ABSTRACT - In Field experiments, a logarithmic sprayer was used to screen the
efficacy of 28.5% mixture of nicosulfuron and mesotrione, and the herbicides applied
separately. Three adjuvants were also used to assess how they affected the potency
of the mixture. The objectives were to test whether a mixture was enhancing or
detracting the effect relative to ADM (Additive Dose Model). The test plants were
canola and barley. The 28.5% nicosulfuron mixture was acting antagonistic,
irrespective of plant species. The antagonistic effect of the nicosulfuron mixture
decreased the more developed the plants became; for barley, it almost disappeared
40 days after treatment. For both canola and barley, one adjuvant stood out as being
highly effective in decreasing ED50 of the mixture. Antagonism was not alarmingly
high, which is found for many herbicides. Results are discussed in relation to the
practice of testing mixtures in the literature and the requirements for getting mixture
patents.

Keywords: mixture models, Additive Dose Model (ADM), Multiplicative Survival
Model (MSM), adjuvant effect.
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

RESUMO - Um pulverizador logar&#xED;tmico foi utilizado para avaliar a efic&#xE1;cia da
mistura de 28,5% de nicosulfuron e mesotrione, al&#xE9;m da aplica&#xE7;&#xE3;o isolada de
cada herbicida. O objetivo deste trabalho foi testar se a mistura &#xE9; sin&#xE9;rgica ou
antag&#xF4;nica, atrav&#xE9;s do modelo ADM (Modelo Aditivo de Dose). As esp&#xE9;cies usadas
no estudo foram canola e cevada. A mistura de 28,5% de nicosulfuron agiu como
antagonista, independentemente das esp&#xE9;cies testadas. O efeito antagonista da
mistura de nicosulfuron reduziu-se &#xE0; medida que as plantas se desenvolviam; na
cevada, o efeito quase desapareceu 40 dias ap&#xF3;s o tratamento. Tanto para a canola
como para a cevada, um dos adjuvantes destacou-se como altamente eficaz na
redu&#xE7;&#xE3;o da ED50 da mistura herbicida. Ficou demonstrado que o antagonismo
n&#xE3;o &#xE9; alarmantemente alto, o que est&#xE1; de acordo com o observado em muitos
herbicidas. Os resultados s&#xE3;o discutidos em rela&#xE7;&#xE3;o &#xE0; pr&#xE1;tica de ensaios de misturas
na literatura e aos requisitos para obter patentes de mistura.

Palavras-chave: modelos para testar misturas, modelo aditivo de dose (ADM),
modelo multiplicativo de sobreviv&#xEA;ncia (MSM), efeito de
adjuvantes.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">HERBICIDA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">MISTURA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ADITIVO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ANTAGONISMO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SINERGISMO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">886</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">1815</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Londrina-PR : Sociedade Brasileira da Ci&#xEA;ncia das Plantas Daninhas, 1978</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2023-031022</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Planta Daninha (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0100-8358; 1806-9681 (on-line)</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 36 p. 1-11; (2018)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2023000120</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/pd/a/nLRtDLrDgDJLj9SYKYtphPk/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Anal&#xED;tica</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">9009</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9009</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
