<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04574nab a2200289 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">BR-BrBNA</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20230913113548.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230703b2019    bl.ar|pooa||| 00| 0 eng |</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BR-BrBNA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="072" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">H60</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">0337</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dominschek, R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Deiss, L.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lang, C.R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Moraes, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pelissari, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">High sunflower densities as a weed control strategy in an integrated crop-livestock system</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Publica&#xE7;&#xE3;o on-line; 27 ref.; 2 tables; 3 illus.; Summaries (En, Pt)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

ABSTRACT - Sunflower is an important crop for Integrated Crop-livestock Systems
(ILCS), and one of the main management difficulties identified in this crop is weed
control, especially under no-till conditions when chemical weed control is not allowed.
Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of greater sunflower
population density on weed control, and its impact on sunflower yield, in an ILCS
with eucalyptus in an Environmental Protection Area. Two population densities
were tested (45 and 90 thousand pl. ha-1) in two crop systems (sunflower monoculture
and sunflower-eucalyptus integration). An additional treatment was provided in the
sunflower-eucalyptus integration, and 5 positions (2,4; 4,8; 7,2; 9,6; and 12 m) between
the tree rows were evaluated. In a randomized block design, with eight repetitions,
weed density and weed dry matter were determined at 40, 70 and 100 days after crop
emergence. Also, phytosociological indices were calculated. The following yield
components were evaluated: head diameter, number of achenes per head, and 1000-
achene weight. There was lower weed infestation on the high density treatment in
both systems. There was no difference of weed occurrence in the 5 positions between
the tree rows. Sunflower yield was higher in the greatest population density in both
systems. Increasing population density in sunflower crop is a practicable management
to control weeds and to gain higher yield under free-herbicide conditions.

Keywords: cultural weed management, Environmental Protection Area, herbicidefree no-till system.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">

RESUMO - O girassol &#xE9; uma cultura importante para os sistemas integrados de
produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o agropecu&#xE1;ria (SIPA), e uma das principais dificuldades de manejo nessa
cultura consiste no controle de plantas daninhas, especialmente em condi&#xE7;&#xF5;es em
que o controle qu&#xED;mico n&#xE3;o &#xE9; permitido. Portanto, o objetivo desta pesquisa foi
verificar o efeito do adensamento populacional do girassol no controle de plantas
daninhas e seu impacto na produtividade da cultura, em SIPA integrado com
eucalipto de um ano, em uma &#xC1;rea de Prote&#xE7;&#xE3;o Ambiental. Foram testadas duas
popula&#xE7;&#xF5;es (45 e 90 mil pl. ha-1) em dois sistemas de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o (monocultivo de
girassol e integra&#xE7;&#xE3;o girassol-eucalipto). Ainda, nas &#xE1;reas de integra&#xE7;&#xE3;o girassoleucalipto, 
as avalia&#xE7;&#xF5;es ocorreram em cinco posi&#xE7;&#xF5;es (2,4; 4,8; 7,2; 9,6; e 12 m)
entre os renques de &#xE1;rvores. Em um delineamento em blocos ao acaso, com oito
repeti&#xE7;&#xF5;es, determinou-se a densidade e a mat&#xE9;ria seca de plantas daninhas por
esp&#xE9;cie, aos 40, 70 e 100 dias ap&#xF3;s a emerg&#xEA;ncia da cultura. Tamb&#xE9;m foram
calculados &#xED;ndices fitossociol&#xF3;gicos. Os componentes de rendimento do girassol
analisados foram: di&#xE2;metro do cap&#xED;tulo, n&#xFA;mero de aqu&#xEA;nios por cap&#xED;tulo e peso
de mil aqu&#xEA;nios. Nas &#xE1;reas com popula&#xE7;&#xE3;o adensada houve menor infesta&#xE7;&#xE3;o de
plantas daninhas, em ambos os sistemas. N&#xE3;o houve diferen&#xE7;a na ocorr&#xEA;ncia de
plantas daninhas nas posi&#xE7;&#xF5;es entre os renques de &#xE1;rvores. A produtividade de
girassol foi superior na popula&#xE7;&#xE3;o mais adensada em ambos os sistemas. O adensamento populacional
na cultura do girassol mostrou-se uma pr&#xE1;tica de manejo vi&#xE1;vel, tanto do ponto de vista de controle de
plantas daninhas como de produtividade de aqu&#xEA;nios em condi&#xE7;&#xF5;es de livre conviv&#xEA;ncia com plantas
daninhas.

Palavras-chave: manejo cultural de plantas daninhas, &#xC1;rea de Prote&#xE7;&#xE3;o Ambiental, plantio direto sem uso
de herbicidas.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ERVA DANINHA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GIRASSOL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">PLANTIO DIRETO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">886</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">1816</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Londrina-PR : Sociedade Brasileira da Ci&#xEA;ncia das Plantas Daninhas, 1978</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">2023-031023</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Planta Daninha (Brazil)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0100-8358; 1806-9681 (on-line)</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">v. 37 p. 1-12; (2019)</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">BR2023000469</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.scielo.br/j/pd/a/jVg6B8YSMpg8prrXkNhRgwF/?format=pdf&amp;lang=en</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">Anal&#xED;tica</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">9507</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9507</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
