| 000 | 01960nab a2200289 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BR-BrBNA | ||
| 005 | 20260417095847.0 | ||
| 008 | 260417b2019 bl.qr|pooa||| 00| 0 eng | | ||
| 040 |
_aBR-BrBNA _beng |
||
| 072 |
_aU10 _b3140 |
||
| 072 | _aK10 | ||
| 100 | _aGuera, Ouorou Ganni Mariel | ||
| 100 | _aSilva, José Antônio Aleixo da | ||
| 100 | _aFerreira, Rinaldo Luiz Caraciolo | ||
| 100 | _aLazo, Daniel Alberto Álvarez | ||
| 100 | _aMedel, Héctor Barrero | ||
| 245 | _aAlternatives to Growth and Yield Prognosis for Pinus caribaea var. caribaea Barrett & Golfari | ||
| 500 | _aPublicação on-line; 29 ref.; 7 tables; 7 illus.; Summary (En) | ||
| 520 | _a ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to obtain regression equations and artificial neural networks (ANNs) for prediction and prognosis of the yield of Pinus caribaea var. caribaea Barrett & Golfari. The data used for modeling comes from measuring the variables diameter at breast height (DBH) and total height (Ht) in 550 temporary plots and 14 circular permanent plots with 500 m2in Pinus caribaea var. caribaea plantations, aged between 3 and 41 years old. In growth prediction, the results indicated Schumacher model as the best fit to the data. On prognosis, the modified Buckman system was better than Clutter’s. ANNs presented a similar performance to the Buckman model in volume prognosis, however these were superior for basal area prognosis. Keywords: plantations, nonlinear regression, artificial neural networks. | ||
| 650 | _aMODELO MATEMÁTICO | ||
| 650 | _aPLANTIO | ||
| 650 | _aPINUS CARIBAEA | ||
| 773 | 0 |
_02929 _9347953 _dRio de Janeiro-RJ Instituto de Florestas - UFRRJ 1994 _o2025-0452 _tFloresta e Ambiente (Brazil) _x1415-0980 / ISSN 2179-8087 0nline _gv. 26(4) p. 1-14; (2019) _wBR2026001227 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://www.scielo.br/j/floram/a/QJWsf9nkLwS5mrtbcrsdRZv/?format=pdf&lang=en | ||
| 942 | _cANA | ||
| 999 |
_c341440 _d341440 |
||